A FOLLOW-UP TO THIS ARTICLE IS NOW PUBLISHED WITH REVISED INFORMATION BASED ON THE SITUATION AS OF MARCH 12, 2020
Note from The Dancing Grapevine: The Author, Dr. Hsu, is a physician actively practicing in both community and acute care hospital settings. She has spoken extensively with a Public Health specialist physician about this matter, particularly how the Novel Coronavirus will interact with our dance communities.
Novel Coronavirus: An Unexpected Reality
Is this real life? Yes, it is. But, social media posts from your friends are not the best source of information. Instead, you should look for information from the World Health Organization and your local public health agencies for information about the coronavirus and the latest transmission updates in your area.
What is happening?
As of March 5th, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation provided a fairly comprehensive global summary of the day. The novel Coronavirus is currently undergoing sustained worldwide transmission. Each area is at a different stage of transmission, and the response from each region will likely affect the outcomes for that area.
The key words to watch for when reading about transmission in a community or region are the words “localized transmission”. This means that the virus is no longer traceable to a known contact; instead, it is “running free” in the community. At that point, containing infected people is no longer a viable management strategy by itself.
So far, many governments are trying to implement “social distancing” at the local transmission stage to reduce the severity of the mass outbreak. This means keeping at least 6 feet (2 metres) between you and others, as well as limiting your community exposure.
What does that mean for social dancing?
Currently, it appears that for each person with COVID-19 (the novel Coronavirus disease), they infect two others. Partner social dancing, especially Brazilian Zouk, Bachata, Tango, Kizomba, and others, involve people in close physical contact. This means that transmission rate could be higher among social dancers. Social dancers also tend to travel large distances to dance events, which compounds their exposure risk.
What should we do as a community?
To understand Coronavirus and the public response so far, we need to be aware of a few cognitive biases innate to all humans.
The first is “normalcy bias” during disasters. Many people tend to believe things will function as they always do. This means they underestimate the likelihood of a disaster and its subsequent effects. This is why, for example, people stay home during hurricanes or wildfires despite evacuation notices.
The second (and opposite) cognitive bias is the “overreaction”. This means that people panic and overreact in ways that may not aid the situation. For example, the current trend of individuals buying up medical masks and depleting overall community stock qualify as an overreaction.
The third cognitive bias is “attribute substitution bias”. Reputable studies show that humans instinctively try to use as little mental effort as possible. In these cases, people may base a decision on intuition or convenience instead of facts and reflection. Or, they may inadvertently answer an easier question instead of the bigger, harder one. For example, instead of answering whether it’s a good idea to go out dancing, they may respond “I’m carrying hand sanitizer”. This bias makes situations like a novel virus and a once-in-a-lifetime outbreak challenging. With information changing daily, heaps of uncertainty, and inconsistent public health messaging, many of us are at risk of ‘checking out’ of dealing with the real issues.
The Reliable Information So Far
To simplify the search for information, below is a summary of the information that I and my professional colleagues view as accurate and reliable (so far):
- Coronavirus primarily spreads through respiratory droplet/secretions (sneezing, coughing).
- There are a few reports of contact transmission (touching things), airborne transmission (breathing it in), and asymptomatic transmission (transmission by people with no symptoms).
- Coronavirus is not influenza (“the flu”). The main differences are:
- Unlike the flu, most of the world has no immunity to Coronavirus
- The annual flu’s case fatality rate is around 0.1%. Current World Health Organization estimates place Coronavirus’ case fatality rate at 3.4% (at the time of writing). Even though this rate may drop as more people are tested, it is not comparable to influenza.
- This Coronavirus has only been infecting people for approximately three months. We do not know if it will improve in the Northern Hemisphere’s summer. There continues to be sustained local transmission in South East Asia, where the weather is hot and humid (more similar to our summers).
Note from TDG: If you think even 2% is “not bad”, think of it this way: 2% of a 500 person dance event is 10 people. 0.1% is not even one person. And, although the virus does affect the elderly more severely, it also is worse for people with weaker immune systems or co-morbidities (other diseases). Plus, some of our dancers are elderly, or have compromised immune systems.
This doesn’t mean 10 people at a dance event will die – but it does give a scale of what that small number actually does look like. And, even if at an event of 500 people only 50 people get infected, those people are likely to each give it to 2 other people. Those two other people may not be the generally young, healthy dancers of the community.
Coronavirus has already impacted other dance events! Some events have also made the difficult decision to cancel – including a West Coast Swing event in Singapore and Tango events in Europe.
How Coronavirus Impacts Us
NOTE: THIS INFORMATION NO LONGER REFLECTS THE BEST PRACTICE ADVICE FROM DR. HSU GIVEN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE COVID-19 SITUATION. PLEASE REFER TO THE UPDATED ARTICLE.
After consulting with infectious disease and public health specialists about social partner dancing, I would suggest the following:
If you are a social dancer and/or event attendee:
Please refrain from attending social events if:
- You have any flu-like symptoms, including fever, cough, or difficulty breathing
- You returned from travel in the last 3 weeks or live in an area with sustained local transmission (not just a travel ban/warning).
- You have had close physical contact with a person currently under investigation for COVID-19, or whom is a confirmed case of COVID-19
If you are healthy and do attend a social or event, please wash, wash, wash your hands. The best way is with soap and water. Second is an alcohol-based hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol content. If you are able to wash your hands, use soap and water for a minimum 20 seconds (long enough to sing “Happy Birthday” to yourself twice) as frequently as possible. Avoid touching your face and avoid touching other people’s faces.
Note from TDG: I saw a fantastic post from a social dancer about making a plan to wash her hands every 5 songs. Maybe go for that – or even more! Also, check out this fun hand-washing video – it’s Zoukable!
Event, Class, and Social Cancellations
Please be understanding that these are extraordinary times, and that events/classes/socials you have paid for may need to be modified or cancelled – perhaps with limited refund options or without the ability to get refunds on flights and other expenses. That is (understandably) a disappointing and frustrating experience.
At the same time, please understand that event organizers may not be able to recuperate all their costs, and if they issue full refunds to everyone, then they may be in a financially detrimental situation – up to and including not being able to run the event again.
So please, be understanding and try to accept the situation as it evolves. Events may be cancelled or changed on short notice, and your travel plans may change last minute. Again, these are extraordinary times.
TDG: When speaking with Dr. Hsu, she also mentioned that for young, healthy populations (which isn’t every dance scene or every dancer), the risk is not mainly death by Coronavirus. Rather, there’s a concern about overwhelming medical systems, which would lead to poorer health outcomes across many areas – not just for the viral infection. For example, care for the flu, heart attacks, stroke, cancer, and other serious conditions with a higher mortality rate. For that not to happen, the rate of spread has to be controlled enough for systems to keep up.
If you are a community leader or event organizer
NOTE: THIS INFORMATION NO LONGER REFLECTS THE BEST PRACTICE ADVICE FROM DR. HSU GIVEN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE COVID-19 SITUATION. PLEASE REFER TO THE UPDATED ARTICLE.
People will be looking to you for leadership and guidance in these times. Please assume your responsibility as leaders in the community include trying to optimize the health of the community. The decisions we make will affect the health of others. Your decision whether to hold a public gathering involving people in close physical contact (some with significant travel histories) may have serious consequences in this period of active global coronavirus transmission. At minimum, please take all measures available to facilitate hand sanitizing and surface disinfecting practices at your events and gatherings.
If you are currently in a place with no localized transmission of Coronavirus, chances are your local government is making all attempts to keep it that way as long as possible. Please consider asking artists and attendees not to attend your event if they have respiratory symptoms, a travel history in the last 21 days to an area with local transmission, or physical contact history with a suspected/confirmed Coronavirus case.
If you are currently in a place with localized transmission, please seriously consider whether organizing a gathering is responsible. At this time, one commonly-utilized public health intervention to prevent mass outbreaks in communities with localized transmission is social distancing. This means avoiding public gatherings and close contact with others. It is a well-established strategy to reduce disease transmission. Unfortunately, a Zouk social or event is inherently incompatible with social distancing.
I want to also take this time to acknowledge that event organization is hard work, that is often financially neutral or at a loss. It is done for the love of the dance and the community. None of us ever thought we would be put in a position of making mini-public health decisions. But again, these are extraordinary times. The additional challenges lies within the fact that the virus has just started transmitting and we don’t have a complete picture – yet.
Addendum from Dr. Hsu: On further reflection, wristbands also provide a potential route for transmission if they are not adequately washed. Many wristbands also have mechanical designs that prevent them from being adequately washed. Therefore, I would advise either placing the band on the ankle or higher on the arm, rather than around the wrist, to ensure contact between the band, surfaces, and partners is minimized.
Note from TDG: Organizers – Plan now. For everything. Even if you think it won’t happen. It’s a lot better if you have an ultimately unnecessary cancellation and management plan for your event than being caught with your shoes off. Plus, having a plan in place shows attendees that you are thinking about this and care about their safety – as well as minimizes outrage if you do end up having to postpone or cancel.
If you are a traveling artist:
NOTE: THIS INFORMATION NO LONGER REFLECTS THE BEST PRACTICE ADVICE FROM DR. HSU GIVEN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE COVID-19 SITUATION. PLEASE REFER TO THE UPDATED ARTICLE.
I want to acknowledge that your job can be very difficult. You spend your days and weeks crossing international borders and time zones, and your work can be physically, mentally, and emotionally demanding. You are also independent contractors who have no job security. Your physical health is crucial. A lost economic opportunity due to infectious control measures is unfortunate.
However, please view these measures as protection for you as well. Your health is your job asset. When entering new contract negotiations, consider negotiating a clause which allows cancellation on your part if you become concerned about your exposure risk to COVID-19 as a part of a work contract.
Note from TDG – Remember that if you are travelling frequently and get infected, that can have major implications for the entire scene. Stay safe, plan your travel appropriately, and avoid unnecessary risk.
This post freaked me out. What should I do now?
Things will get better, but they will get worse before they get better. No one knows how long it will take, or how many people will be affected. Anyone who claims to know that with certainty is misinformed at best.
The answer to what you should do depends on where you live. Listen to the public health officials in your area, and try to critically evaluate messages from popular and social media. There is a lot of false information out there on both sides of the spectrum ranging from denial/dismissal to hysteria (from normalcy to overreaction bias).
Neither ends of that spectrum are helpful right now. Stay calm, remember your own likely cognitive bias towards dismissing complex, ever-changing information (the COVID-19 cases evolving every day), and try to sit with the inherent uncertainty of this situation. Continue your life – but perform a risk assessment of your situation. Your own risk assessment on whether to participate or host any public activity should depend on the area where you live, its transmission rates, your personal health, your profession, and your regular physical contacts’ health (such as elderly parents, roommates, children, or close friends).
We are all in this together. And remember:
- Do wash your hands, and try not to touch your face. It’s your best defence.
- Don’t hoard masks, they don’t protect you – they stop sick people from spreading their germs around, which we will all need and appreciate.
Note from TDG: Just like you, organizers are evaluating the situation and watching for further developments. What each event decides to do will largely be based on their attendance demographics, artists, and local situation. It’s impossible to know what the situation will be in a month or two. So, breathe, wash your hands, enjoy your life – but keep an eye on how things around you are developing.
i strongly believe during a time of level 3 global travel advisor dance events should be cancelled. travelling professional dancers have to make money and thats rough but this is a global health risk! your money isnt going to keep you safe. in nyc any student traveling over spring break is required to self quaratine for 14 days. otherwise if known, suspended! schools are closing in the city. this is a serious issue. it keeps on spreading because there are still people who don’t realize it or take it seriously! and guess what? they will be the first ones to get them! don’t get too excited about dancing with those international artists!
Thank you for writing this insightful article. It helps me gather my thoughts and gives me a means to organise myself as an organiser of weekly social dance events. I shared it with my students to give them a heads up and to get a grip on their own situation and responsibilities
I am concerned about Contra Dancing as we are in very close contact with Every dancer on the floor! Exchanging hand holds, close embrace swings etc
Thanks for this informations. As a non professionnal dancer, I think that an annulation of a festival of dance, on a week end for example, is difficult for me. But I will understand too if the organiser will keep 1 à 5 % of my pass and not return this part to me. In order to pay the place / the location of the dancefloor. I will lost 5% but it will help the organisation to not have a difficultie for its business. It would be fine to me and I’m sure I’m not the only one 🙂 Go and think about it ! 😉
Hello from Ground zero in Seattle, Washington! Thank you so much for taking the time and energy to write this. Leaders in our community are facing the struggle right now. I will be sending this to as many people as I can think of who are in a position to decide whether to cancel their events or not.
Hi, I found your article informative and very helpful. There was one confusing statement to me regarding “localized transmission”. You state that once that occurs, “containing infected people is no longer a viable management strategy. ” That seems odd to me. Containing infected people, whether via self-quarantine – or in severe cases in medical isolation settings – seems fundamentally essential. Perhaps you meant that in a way I didn’t get? I’m also glad that you’re encouraging event organizers to take responsibility to be informed and cancel when necessary – there is nothing wrong with an abundance of caution! Finally, people need to understand that generic alcohol-based hand cleaners, while good for general hygiene, are not (according to the CDC) effective in killing this virus.
Hey Richard,
From Dr. Hsu:
This means that it is no longer the ONLY management strategy. It doesn’t mean that people shouldn’t be in quarantine. It actually means that more and more people need to be quarantined and are super important to slowing the spread. But, additional measures are needed to try to slow the spread of the disease in a case where there is local transmission because it is in the general population.
I just checked on the CDC website, Corona virus section, and it DOES recommend using alcohol based hand sanitizers.
There is a specific alcohol percentage you need to use, and you need to rub your hands effectively.
Thank you!!
Laura,
It is advisable that hand sanitizing alcohol be greater than 60%. Some homes may have only 50% isopropyl alcohol on their shelves. Also check dates for effectiveness. If a sanitizer gel has been on your shelf since Swine Flu, it is time to pitch it out and replace it with a fresh and effective product!
This article over-exaggerated the effect of the virus on dancing people… “Coronavirus’ mortality rate at 3.4%” is also just wrong and mainly a number from inside Wuhan and the regions with very bad health care standards.
“2% of a 500 person dance event is 10 people”
Sure, but confirmed mortality rate of 1-2% is mainly around the elderly and with a preexisting condition.
That means even with 1000 dancers there will most likely not a single person that will face serious or deadly injury here.
They are not >> 70 years, nor in any (unhealthy) medical state that would mean any serious harm in the western world.
No need to panic!
3.4% also reflects Italy, Seattle, and more (I verified this with Dr. Hsu over the phone before posting). And, deaths have not only occurred in 70+, though it is more risky to be older. Also, many dancers do have compromised immune systems or pre-existing conditions, and in some communities a lot of people are over 70. Last, the possibility of bringing it home to Grandma is high. I do think that in an outbreak, the entire dance community escaping unscathed is probably not going to happen, even if we don’t get the worst of it.
I agree that we shouldn’t panic. But, taking something seriously is important.
Mark, I agree that there is no need to panic. However, your dance community is clearly very different from mine. We have regular dancers who are over 70, including several who are on or have been on chemo and have compromised immune systems.
Regarding calculations of mortality rates, we simply don’t have enough data. Mortality rates from Seattle are synthetically high, due to the extreme percentage of infected elderly individuals from a long term care facility. Data from China may also suggest higher mortality rates than might be seen in countries with lower smoking rates and less polluted skies. And how do we account for asymptomatic individuals? We don’t even know if the percentage of asymptomatic infected individuals will be consistent between communities, let alone knowing how effective they are as infectious carriers.
For now, don’t panic but don’t disregard warnings. Be cautious and rely on data, not hunches.
I am over 60 and have bad lungs. I present as healthy because I ride a trike for local errands. Many of the dancers at our local dance are my age or older. I also have 2 elderly 95+ parents that live in my town.Catching this could be a death sentence for me or my parents. I get all the vaccines available every year. There is nothing available yet for this. Our medical system is lean and is not set up to expand quickly to keep people alive until their body can fight off the virus and hopefully recover. I will be very, very careful even if it means no dancing, which I love.
I think this sums up the dance communities attitude towards this in general.
“As long as we’re ok it doesn’t really matter”
Nevermind the fact that if the dance community gets it, it increases the risk of spreading to other (often elderly) people.
Great info and post.
I disagree with Dr. Hsu in the following argument:
The mortality rate mentioned here (3.4%) is a result of an overly biased sample data set.
That means, the tests were done people who showed significant symptoms and mostly in the risk group, as such, the calculated mortality rate contains that bias.
Only reliable data set in this perspective is collected by South Korea
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-04/south-korea-tests-hundreds-of-thousands-to-fight-virus-outbreak
And total mortality rate is about 0.5%.
When it is broken down to the different age groups, it is even lower in mortality rate.
Cosan Caglayan, Ph.D
From Dr. Hsu:
Yes, when the head of the WHO talked on March 3 it was case fatality rate. CFR is going to vary based on region, their response to it, and their available health resources. No one can say they know for sure right now what the CFR is going to be where they are. WHO had to do the best they can, which is to be transparent with the updated data. That’s the best thing they can do right now for everyone globally. Yes, CFR is impacted by testing – but it’s also impacted by number of deaths. People take time to die in the ICU. So while we don’t have complete picture of number infected we also don’t have complete picture of number of people who are going to die. Also, there can be poorly resources countries that haven’t/don’t/can’t test their dead patients for coronavirus.
I said in the article that that number is likely to decrease in the future. South Korea has excellent healthcare system and they’re trying really hard to keep severely ill people alive. If an outbreak happens in another country with a more over burdened healthcare system, the death rate can be more than 0.5.
That is exactly my point, Dr. Hsu but why you underline the fatalities going uncounted while there are so many uncounted infected individuals recovered without any symptoms and minor symptoms?
Typically CFR peaks in the beginning at an outbreak due to biased testing:
http://www.virology.ws/2020/03/05/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-case-fatality-ratio/
Key takeaway is :
“However, please understand that a CFR of 3.4% does not apply to everyone; what happens to you if infected depends on your age, health status, and where you live.”
I am simply disappointed that you did not make this point in your post.
Regards,
As mentioned, much of what you are pointing out is stated in the article. For the rest, I think Dr. Hsu’s response answered the first part of your question 🙂
Are there any confirmed cases among tango dancers? The probability of spreading indeed appears to be higher but I am also hoping that all these years dancing in such close contact with many people helped many of us to adapt our immune systems (at least to some degree).
There are cases of people confirmed from a Tango event in Europe. I’m not sure of their ages or health status. The physician writer advised that because this is a novel virus strain, current populations likely do not have an immune response.
Yes there are confirmed cases from an Italian encuentro and a Spanish dancer who returned home caught it. This is one link, and you can find others about the Spanish person who got it at that encuentro: https://www.ilrestodelcarlino.it/ferrara/cronaca/coronavirus-tango-1.5055587
Hi Olga, this is a great question. I can speak to your last comment with authority as both a dancer and a microbiologist. The coronavirus strain that causes covid-19 has not circulated in humans before so NO ONE has immunity. Immunity is established by prior exposure to a specific pathogen. It’s possible tango dancers have built a larger library than the average person of things they no longer have to worry about. Unfortunately they are just as vulnerable as the next person to something brand new.
Sorry to break these disturbing mortality facts to tango dancers considerably younger than myself – the Chinese whistle-blower (on the spread of the coronavirus COD_19) Doctor Li Wenliang died at the age of 34, Feb 6.
Another Wuhan doctor, Liu Zhiming, died Feb 18 at the age of 51.
While writing this I find a third Wuhan doctor, Peng Yinhua, 29, who died Feb 20.
Finally, the Italian doctor Carlos Urbani, who identified the SARS virus (close predecessor of today’s corona, COD-19) in 2003, died after being in contact with ONE patient, sick from SARS. He was 46 yo, leaving behind his wife and three children.
(Briefly – SARS came with a total mortality rate of 11 %, although with big differences depending on the age of the infected. People under 24 were blessed with less than 1 % risk to die – but from infected patients over 65 – for 55 % the outcome was fatal. According to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.)
CONCLUSION: The coronavirus is not easy to evaluate at the present moment, we have low plausibilities to foresee where it will show and we do not know who will be infected. Though less fatal than SARS, statistics trend that infected salsa, lindy and zouk dancers will pay a lesser mortal toll than infected tango addicts (considering differences in the average age), but at the same time, young adults do not have complete immunity.
I will heed the advice of Dr. HSU and refrain from nitpicking on data etc., especially at the beginning stages of this unforeseen calamity.
Thank you of all of this. I’m volunteering at my local dance and we have not decided to stop dancing yet but the writing is on the wall. I’m assuming that dancing will end when a dancer reports that they have tested positive. Along those lines, a few suggestions: 1) advertise how a dancer should contact the dance presenter if they test positive, 2) advertise how that information will be disseminated once it happens so that everyone knows, and 3) urge dancers to take a shower including washing hair immediately after the dance, removing clothes while turning them inside out and getting them into the laundry. My dad’s assisted living center has a policy of washing every patient every day to keep those germs going down the drain, and they have a remarkable success rate keeping colds and flu away from the patients.
Excellent post. I completely agree with the sentiment expressed. Very well written and thought through.
Three things worry me.
1. I think that waiting for “sustained local transmission” may be slightly sub-optimal–although I don’t have the data or the epidemiology background to know that it is sub-optimal or to know what is optimal. I am assuming a lag between person X getting infected and being diagnosed of some number of days or weeks. During that time, she is possibly or likely spreading the disease so that by the time she is diagnosed, she has spread it to additional people who themselves are spreading the disease. How long does it take before someone gets it but the source cannot be identified? How long before enough people get it without identified sources that the criteria for sustained local transmission is met?
2. The impact could be not only on 500 dancers (or, presumably, some unguessable portion of the 500) but also on their families and others in their various circles.
3. Newly- infected dancers could bring the disease back to their home communities, and to other dance events that they go to.
My gut sense is communities as a whole (dance and others) should be more proactive than waiting for “sustained local transmission” but, again, I have no idea either what is optimal or to what degree I am over-reacting. However, I live with a person who has asthma and who has had some challenges around that this year already and I myself want to be cautious.
As a dance and folk musician, I will be very cautious about where I play. An asthmatic, in January I contracted what became overnight a life-threatening cold. After weeks on prednisone and zithromax, two months later, I’m still recovering. I don’t get close to people or shake hands anyway and I wear gloves to the grocery store. I don’t touch doorknobs. This is my normal go-to behavior. Don’t get me wrong – I’m a warm, loving person who just doesn’t want your infections. I have one dance coming up in late April and will back out if this virus shows up in Western MA, as I have concluded that drowning in my own phlegm is not a rock and roll death. So yeah, let’s be vigilant and careful but let’s keep our sense of humor, eh?
Thank you for your informative and, all in all, calming report. I found the information on cognitive biases especially interesting. We have a weekend event coming up at the end of March, and are keeping close tabs on our local situation. We would of course rather not cancel, but are prepared to do so if necessary.
Laura and all,
Thank you so much for your work on this, the article is very helpful, as are the comments. Our dance community is mostly older, 60s+ for many. We sweat a *lot* and we dance with the entire room of people, since contra dancing means switching partners every dance, and each couple advances through the line of other couples. Caution is absolutely key here, while relying on common sense may not cut it (because it’s not as common as we would wish, is it?)
Thanks you for this very useful article. As an officer of a ballroom dance organization in a senior community where almost all of our dancers are 60 or over, I just emailed it to the entire Board. It is excellent preparation for decisions I know we will have to make regarding our monthly dances with live bands. As an Emerita Professor of Public Health, I appreciate your evidence-based information on CFR and how to interpret it to those unfamiliar with these concepts. Your discussion of cognitive biases also reflects my concerns about current complacency, and this article will help us! Thank you for taking time to publish this and to personally answer questions.
Jackie, with all due respect, and because we agree the writing is on the wall, it seems foolish to continue dancing until a dancer report testing positive.
At that point numerous other dancers will have been contaminated already.
It really is that simple
Thank you to all who contributed to this important conversation and information source! I am inclined toward Dave Marcus’s above perspective, especially since there has only been a pittance of testing, both here in Oregon and across the country. We lack much of any current and relatively complete real time data. Also, I have read that CV can be asymtomatic for up to 24 days. Combining these two above facts along with many other unknowns, it is clear that there are unknown levels of risks to many many people that are presently potentially very dangerous. As tempted as this writer is, a passionate dance lover, to just go dance anyway, it seems prudent, and possibly life saving for even multiple people, to let some more data come in to shed light on what is actually happening more first. Each of us could very well be one of the symptomless carriers, passing the whole infestation ever wider. It’s a leap out of character for me to err on the side of caution, but maybe being 73, for several reasons, has something to do with it!!!!!
I agree with you and Dave Marcus, and I had the same advice for my dance community this morning. I normally consider dance to be one of the most important things of all for my own physical and emotional health. But I think this is not the time for partner dancing among seniors, which can easily contribute to the spread of this disease. It’s really hard for me to say that, and not follow my own yearning to go to my favorite dances. But I don’t want them to get a bad reputation either.
Creative dance communities might want to experiment with alternative genres, like 4-wall line dances (in which people dance in a grid and face different walls at different times) which help you practice footwork, while being in community and reinforcing the temporary norm of social distancing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_dance
May be tango community should enforce hands washing for 20 seconds with CDC recommended sanitizer between each tanda; with may be cortina should be longer to allow dancers to do this in the time of coronavirus.
It would bring BYO to another level 🙂 every participant bringing mandatory sanitizer to attend the event.
That is an excellent suggestion Maria. We need some clear guidelines like this to be embraced by all event organizers. What I see developing is chaos and a desire to ignore the reality of what we’re facing — “normalcy bias” as noted in the article above. (One issue is that currently in US it’s probably difficult to obtain enough sanitizer to implement your policy. We likely have to wait a few weeks for supplies to be restocked.)
Yours is the first clear cut and to the point common sense answer!
Why take chances? Dancing will be there after this has passed. Be smart! Stop looking for reasons to believe it is ok to continue meeting in large close contact groups.
They just closed Italy. 60 million people in quarantine. That’s where the US is headed due to the lackadaisical manner that our government is handling this.
Ferrara – first documented case in tango
Linda Degutis Overall this is good as far as prevention goes, but there are a few things that need updating, including the information about transmission. Hope it will be updated on a regular basis as we learn more.
This well-balanced article impressed me! First, it is a good read from a-z. The article is not a general corona story, but very well edged towards the specific dynamics of dancing community. It provides the different perspectives of the individual dancers and organisers. However, it also goes on to identify risks to more distant ‘stakeholders’ outside the dancing community: the possibly fragile acquaintances of dancers and how actions (or non-actions) that could slow the spread of the virus may prevent the healthcare system from overflowing. I see this article as both highly informative and as a soft call on dancers to decide for themselves how to handle the evolving Corona situation
I think it’s too late for some parts of the dance community in all of this. The community is obviously unique in that people touch each other go to many different events and is connected globally. The degree of separation between a person touching someone on one side of the world and another is tiny. Also, dancers are fanatical so expecting people not to come out when they’re not feeling well is naive to say the least.
Not a huge amount is known about this virus, that’s why people don’t know what an over-reaction is. If there is a strain of the virus that can spread without symptoms, then all that has to happen is one person in the community gets it and it spreads like wildfire. It’s well known for flu and colds to go through festivals like this. We also don’t know how or whether it will mutate or create a second wave.
From my point of view lindy hop as a community in the UK where localized transmission has been occurring for some time has already put a marker in the sand that they don’t care that much about the rest of the world. I know that people’s livelihoods depend on dancing but the fact is, it isn’t a necessary activity at the moment. If millions of people die, are they going to say they did everything they did to prevent this? I don’t think they honestly can.
The news is changing by the day. Seriously, folks, just give it up. I know how dance becomes an obsession but your social responsibility is bigger than that. Time to stay home, watch dance videos, and brush up on your technique.
Hello Dr. Hsu, I would be very much interested to know what do you think about the return to “normal life”. When will dance, and most of all, social dance activities as classes and events take place again, and under which circumstances?
Your point of view would be very interesting for me and my professional and personal environment.
Thank you in adavance!